Service Center
Concept Proposal Intake Process
Welcome to the 51ÔÚÏß’s Concept Proposal Intake Process (previously Space Impact Request [SIR] Process). This process is designed to assist colleges and administrative units in submitting requests for space-related projects and facility changes. Whether you need to modify existing spaces, request new facilities, or plan for long-term space requirements, the Concept Proposal Intake Form is your starting point.
Key Changes to the Process
The process has been streamlined to improve efficiency and clarity:
- New Form Submission Method: The traditional Space Impact Request (SIR) has been replaced with the Concept Proposal Intake Form.
- Submission Platform: Instead of submitting requests through the Service Center and uploading them into FAMIS, all Intake Forms are now submitted via Monday.com, making the process more intuitive and accessible.
- Submit Your Proposal: Complete the Concept Proposal Intake Form via
Important Information on Concept Proposals
What is a Concept Proposal?
A Concept Proposal provides USF with the initial information needed to evaluate potential changes or impacts to campus spaces. These proposals help ensure that all facility modifications align with the university's strategic goals, comply with space standards, and meet safety and regulatory requirements.
When to Submit a Concept Proposal
Academic requests to relocate, expand, or establish new space must be reviewed by the Academic Space Advisory Committee prior to submitting a Concept Proposal.
Submit a Concept Proposal if your department is planning any of the following:
- Changes to the use or function of a space
- Minor alterations such as adding an outlet, signage, or flooring replacement
- Renovations or remodeling
- New construction
- Requests for additional space
- Temporary or permanent changes that may impact campus operations or infrastructure
How the Process Works
1. Submission:
Customers submit their project proposals through the Concept Proposal Intake Form, providing key details such as objectives, scope, and timeline. The form is shared with the Intake Committee for review.
2. Intake Committee Review:
Once the proposal is received, it is reviewed by the Intake Committee. The committee evaluates the proposal and decides whether it should:
-
- Proceed to the VP Governance Committee for further review, or
- Route through FAMIS. If the proposal involves smaller-scale operational tasks, such as maintenance or IT-related services, the Intake Committee may route it directly to the appropriate Operational Groups through FAMIS for execution. These proposals are typically handled outside the larger project planning and delivery process​.
3. VP Governance Committee Review:
For more complex or strategic proposals, the VP Governance Committee reviews the proposal to ensure alignment with the University’s goals and priorities. This review occurs monthly. Only after the committee’s approval does the proposal move forward in the process​.
Following intake and/or governance review, the customer will receive an automated notification for one of the following:
-
- The request is being routed to FAMIS for execution by one of our operational teams.
- The request is proceeding to the next phase of review, led by the Planning department.
- The request has been reviewed and will not be proceeding, typically due to resource constraints or strategic priorities.
4. Concept Development and Beyond:
Upon VP Governance approval, the assigned Planning Project Manager works with the customer to develop the project concept in greater detail. This includes gathering functional narratives, consulting with subject matter experts (SMEs), and refining cost estimates and timelines. Customer alignment and approval are required before moving the project into the Due Diligence ±è³ó²¹²õ±ð​.
See Project Delivery Process Overview below for more details on this stage.
Resources and Support
For additional information on how to complete the Concept Proposal Intake Form or for support during the submission process, contact the Office of Administrative Services Service Center.
Phone: (813) 974-2750
Email: FM-ServiceCenter@usf.edu
Project Delivery Process Overview
The 51ÔÚÏß's project delivery process ensures that campus space and facility projects are planned, designed, and completed efficiently while meeting the needs of all stakeholders. This structured process provides clear customer checkpoints and timelines to guide departments through each phase of project delivery.
Phases of Project Delivery
The project delivery process is broken into five main phases, each with distinct goals, tasks, and responsibilities led by either the Planning or Design & Construction (DAC) teams.
1. Concept Development Phase
Led by: Planning
Target Duration: 30 days
Overview: During the concept phase, departments submit project requests through the Concept Proposal Intake Form. The Planning team works with the customer to clarify project objectives, develop a functional narrative, and identify resources and risks. Early research, budget range, and timelines are drafted.
Key Checkpoints: Customer alignment on project scope and goals before proceeding to Due Diligence​, OAS governance sign off at end of phase
2. Due Diligence Phase
Led by: Planning
Target Duration: 60 days
Overview: The Planning team refines the project plan, coordinating with subject matter experts and external consultants as needed. Detailed feasibility studies, scope narratives, and preliminary cost estimates are developed to ensure the project’s viability. All findings are summarized and presented to the customer for approval before moving forward.
Key Checkpoints: Customer and governance approvals at the end of this phase​, OAS governance sign off at end of phase
3. Design Phase
Led by: Design & Construction (DAC)
Target Duration: Varies based on project scope
Overview: In this phase, DAC oversees the development of detailed designs and drawings. Regular design milestone reviews are conducted with customer involvement to ensure all project elements align with expectations. Pre-construction planning, budgeting, and scheduling also occur during this phase.
Key Checkpoints: Customer approvals at design deliverable milestones, customer and governance approval at end of design phase, OAS governance sign off at end of phase
4. Construction Phase
Led by: Design & Construction (DAC)
Target Duration: Varies based on project scope
Overview: Once designs are finalized and approved, construction begins. DAC coordinates all construction activities, including contractor oversight and routine inspections. Regular progress updates are provided to the customer, with project closeout preparation beginning as construction nears completion.
Key Checkpoints: Customer involvement in activation and sign-off before occupancy​, OAS governance sign off at end of phase
5. Closeout Phase
Led by: Design & Construction (DAC)
Target Duration: 90 days for minor projects, 180 days for major projects
Overview: After construction is completed, final inspections and necessary approvals are secured. Documentation, such as as-built drawings, warranties, and training materials, are delivered to the customer. The project is officially closed once all requirements are met, and a final customer satisfaction survey is completed.
Key Checkpoints: OAS governance sign off at end of phase
This structured process ensures that all projects are delivered effectively, with clear roles, responsibilities, and regular customer check-ins at each stage. For more details on project submission or support, please contact the Office of Administrative Services.