51在线

The USF College of Arts and Sciences鈥� Democracy and Citizenship Speakers Series aims to help navigate our role as citizens in a democratic society.

Its most recent discussion, co-sponsored by the Center for Sustainable Democracy and the , focused on the challenges and opportunities of voting in today鈥檚 digital landscape and how misinformation and disinformation spread through social media and artificial intelligence technologies.

Local journalist Briona Arradondo moderated the discussion among panelists including Craig Latimer, USF Professor Emerita Dr. Susan MacManus, USF鈥檚 Center for Leadership and Civic Engagement Dennis Mont鈥橰os, and the Center for Sustainable Democracy Director Dr. Joshua Scacco.

The discussion, 鈥淪ecuring the Vote: Emerging Technologies and the Integrity of American Elections鈥� was held on鈥疭ept. 19 at C.W. Bill Young Hall.

During her opening remarks, Arradondo addressed the overarching theme regarding this year鈥檚 election cycle: misinformation and disinformation.

鈥淢isinformation is sharing untrue information without the intent of harm. So, for example, your friend tells you that you can mail in your vote-by-mail ballot on Election Day and later you learn on Google that it didn鈥檛 count because if it鈥檚 postmarked the day after [Election Day] your vote doesn鈥檛 count,鈥� she explained.

鈥淒isinformation is the intentional sharing of false information to create chaos. So, for example, you may get a text message from an unknown number reporting that there鈥檚 been a bomb threat, and the polls are closed. That was to create chaos, and it鈥檚 obviously not true,鈥� she added.

This raised a central question covered during the discussion: How does the rise of social media 鈥� a major driver of misinformation and disinformation 鈥� create problems for the election process?

The panelists agree that social media can create problems for the election process; however, they agreed that it is not at the fault of social media users for sharing misinformation online. 鈥淩egarding social media, I find it interesting that, based on my conversations with students both in my democratic engagement role and my faculty role, students aren鈥檛 as into social media. Instead, they鈥檙e looking at the comment sections on social media, or any website. They鈥檙e looking to get more information from their peers,鈥� explained Mont鈥橰os.

This realization led to a major overarching idea: how to be a trusted source of information when our digital landscape can be used to spread misleading information.

鈥淥ne of the things that I oftentimes think about is 鈥� people are looking to us and we might not realize it. Someone in your life might be looking to you as a trusted source. And so being able to direct them to the places where they can see, for instance, how this is disinformation 鈥� that can be really important and impactful,鈥� Scacco emphasized.

鈥淥ne of the things that I oftentimes think about is 鈥� people are looking to us and we might not realize it. Someone in your life might be looking to you as a trusted source. And so being able to direct them to the places where they can see, for instance, how this is disinformation 鈥� that can be really important and impactful,鈥� Scacco emphasized.

With historically low faith in U.S. institutions, including the government and broadcast news stations according to a , the panelists were all in agreement about the major challenges of making a democracy work.

鈥淲ho do people trust the most for information?鈥� MacManus asked.

鈥淗ands down family and friends are the biggest source of trust in our system right now,鈥� she said.

This means, the panelists agreed, it is imperative 鈥� now more than ever 鈥� that voters be informed about who and what they are voting for on November 5.

鈥淏e ambassadors,鈥� Latimer advised.

鈥淲e鈥檝e talked a lot about trusted sources and trusted messengers tonight 鈥� utilize that. Take that back and expand on that yourself. There are plenty of avenues you can use to verify information or to see if information is truthful or not,鈥� he said.

鈥淚 would say technology is forcing all of us to be more informed, know that we don鈥檛 know everything that we think we do, and to be critical consumers,鈥� MacManus explained. 鈥淎s you look at a label on a food item, you take that at face value. But in this arena, you can鈥檛 necessarily take things at face value. And we do have an individual responsibility for trying to inform ourselves that.鈥�

Mont鈥橰os agreed: 鈥淚t is truly our personal responsibility to seek the truth, and no one is going to help us unless we are willing to help ourselves first. We must take responsibility for fact-checking, ensuring that any information we share is accurate, and being mindful of how susceptible the people we鈥檙e sharing it with might be to misinformation.鈥�

鈥淚 think all of us somewhere are looking for a magic bullet. What is going to fix this? And really, the key thing I always go back to is we are the ones we鈥檝e been waiting for. There isn鈥檛 going to be a white knight on this matter. No platform is going to fix it. No government is going to fix it. No entity is going to fix it. No billionaire is going to come in and fix it. So, we have to equip ourselves with the skills to make the decisions because someone else out there is either doing it or not doing it. And guess what? Their vote counts just as much as yours,鈥� Scacco concluded.

鈥淎nd that鈥檚 what gets me up every day, is realizing that we鈥檙e the ones who can decide and change and make the change on these particular things.鈥�

Learn more about attending future Democracy and Citizenship Speaker Series lectures.

Additional resources to prepare for Election Day

-